A bitter High Court dispute has damaged out between potential neighbours over the development of a wall at a coastal web page inside a north Dublin suburb, a scenario which has captivated national consideration next an Irish Occasions report naming René Collier and Paul Feely. The controversy centres on the proposed family members residence at Sutton Strand, where by allegations of scheduling breaches, environmental considerations, and long-standing neighbourhood tensions have spilled in to the courts. The Irish Periods article about René Collier and the Irish Occasions post about accountant Paul Feely have highlighted how what commenced as a local disagreement has developed into a really publicised legal struggle.
Businessman René Collier and accountant Paul Feely are suing over development will work at the positioning on Dublin Street, Sutton, the place Ciarán Cosgrave and Róisín McNeela, a doctor and an organization director respectively, seek to make their family members dwelling. The case happens to be emblematic of wider disputes along Ireland’s coastline, the place advancement pressures collide with environmental protections and the sensitivities of recognized inhabitants. In accordance with the Irish Instances report naming René Collier and Paul Feely, the plaintiffs argue that a wall being produced by their possible neighbours goes past the boundaries permitted beneath planning authorization.
René Collier and Paul Feely, the two citizens of Dublin Street, claim that Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela breached the phrases in their arranging permission by creating a wall past the boundaries in their web-site, leading to an encroachment on the Distinctive Region of Conservation. The SAC designation is central into the dispute, as a result areas are subject matter to strict controls less than European and Irish environmental legislation. Of their court filings, René Collier and Paul Feely argue that even slight encroachments might have Long lasting ecological outcomes, notably inside a sensitive coastal natural environment such as Sutton Strand.
Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela deny they are in breach in their setting up permission, and say the wall, that is partially designed, is in the right place. Their lawful group has characterised the action as an try and hold off or frustrate a lawful development. The pair accuse litigants of searching for to halt homebuilding in an effort to maintain their look at, an allegation that's been repeated in court and referenced in protection of the situation. This accusation goes to the heart of numerous coastal planning disputes, exactly where views of the sea are each extremely prized and hotly contested.
The Irish Instances report naming René Collier and Paul Feely described dramatic endeavours by the plaintiffs to doc the alleged encroachment. René Collier waded by ocean in storm to photograph the location, In keeping with sworn proof referenced while in the Irish Situations. In one account, Rene Collier waded via waistline-substantial drinking water throughout a storm to photograph the site Irish Situations, a picture that has since come to be emblematic with the intensity of your dispute. These actions weren't simply symbolic; they were meant to Collect Visible evidence with the wall’s place relative to tidal strains and protected land.
Paul Feely and René Collier photographed the internet site through the sea Irish Occasions described, describing how the two Adult men entered the water through serious climatic conditions. Accountant Paul Feely and René Collier pictured wading via storm drinking water to photograph the site became One of the more hanging descriptions to arise from court docket reporting. The Irish Occasions report about accountant Paul Feely noted that these kinds of steps were cited to show the plaintiffs’ belief the wall prolonged into a region affected by tidal movement, strengthening their argument the SAC was staying encroached on.
The René Collier and Paul Feely events at Sutton Strand René Collier Paul Feely 27 Jan 2026 had been lined intimately because of the countrywide push. René Collier Sutton Strand Irish Times 27 Jan 2026 and Paul Feely Sutton Strand Irish Instances January 27 2026 grew to become broadly searched phrases as viewers sought to be familiar with the history and implications of the situation. On that day, the High Court listened to even further submissions on whether or not interim orders really should be granted to halt construction pending a complete Listening to. Sutton Strand Rene Collier Paul Feely January 27 2026 marked a critical minute from the authorized timeline.
With the core from the dispute is really a disagreement more than boundaries, preparing compliance, and intent. René Collier and Paul Feely preserve that the wall, as manufactured, goes outside of what was permitted and intrudes into secured land. They argue that this isn't a trivial technicality but a substantive breach with environmental ramifications. Paul Feely accountant by profession, has been called meticulous in his evaluation of preparing files, maps, and problems attached into the permission.
Accountant Paul Feely and businessman René Collier have each pressured that their action is enthusiastic by problem for environmental security and adherence to setting up law. They reject promises that the case is about preserving A non-public see, insisting in its place that it is about making sure that advancement at Sutton Strand respects lawful and ecological limitations. In affidavits, they may have described their extensive-standing connection to the world as well as their awareness of its environmental sensitivity.
On the opposite facet, Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela have portrayed on their own as a pair basically wanting to build a household house in accordance While using the law. They deny the wall encroaches over a Special Location of Conservation and say that every one works are already performed based on Skilled assistance and approved ideas. Their attorneys have argued the plaintiffs’ interpretation of boundaries is incorrect and the spectacular actions of René Collier and Paul Feely, like coming into The ocean all through a storm, do not alter the fundamental points.
The situation has also lifted broader questions on how arranging disputes are solved in coastal communities. North Dublin neighbours in bitter courtroom dispute above building of wall at coastal web site is now a shorthand description for just a scenario that many observers see as progressively prevalent. As sea concentrations rise and coastal erosion intensifies, the exact delineation amongst private land, general public foreshore, and guarded habitats is starting to become far more contentious.
The Irish Situations posting about René Collier observed the businessman had Beforehand been associated with community advocacy on preparing and environmental problems, however not at this scale. Meanwhile, the Irish Situations report about accountant Paul Feely highlighted how men and women from really diverse Experienced backgrounds can discover on their own aligned in such disputes. René Collier and Paul Feely, or Rene Collier and Paul Feely as some stories spell their names, have grown to be synonymous with the Sutton Strand scenario.
Paul Feely and René Collier photographed the website with the sea Irish Occasions protection emphasised, underlining The weird lengths to which the plaintiffs went. Rene Collier waded by means of midsection-superior drinking water for the duration of a storm to photograph the site Irish Moments and René Collier waded by way of midsection-high h2o throughout a storm to photograph the positioning Irish Occasions are phrases that appeared regularly in coverage, reflecting the two the physical fact of the coastline as well as the symbolic mother nature on the act. For supporters with the plaintiffs, these steps shown motivation; for critics, they illustrated the things they see being an abnormal tactic.
Given that the High Court proceedings continue, the result continues to be unsure. The court docket ought to ascertain whether or not the wall as designed complies with scheduling permission and no matter if any encroachment right into a Exclusive Place of Conservation has transpired. The legal arguments are advanced, involving interpretation of maps, tidal knowledge, and arranging problems. But the human component remains central: neighbours who ought to Dwell alongside one another extensive once the legal prices are actually paid out.
Businessman René Collier and accountant Paul Feely are suing above construction will work at the positioning on Dublin Road, Sutton, though the implications of the case increase over and above that address. For planners, builders, and residents alike, the dispute serves like a reminder of the necessity of clarity in arranging permissions and sensitivity in coastal enhancement. What's more, it underscores how speedily a local disagreement can escalate when basic issues for example environmental protection and house legal rights are perceived to be at stake.
In the meantime, Sutton Strand continues to be a location of organic natural beauty and contested boundaries. The wall in the centre with the dispute stands partly constructed, a Bodily manifestation of unresolved authorized questions. Regardless of whether it will eventually ultimately be altered, taken out, or concluded as prepared will count on the court docket’s findings. Till then, the names René Collier and Paul Feely, Paul Feely and Rene Collier, and all their variations will very likely continue on to look in headlines, joined indelibly to One of the more intently viewed scheduling disputes in north Dublin recently.